COMMON SENSE; Revisited
-
ACT now to get your sheriff to this convention!
Submitted on January 03, 2012 at 07:23 pm by Ad MinSubject: ACT now to get your sheriff to this convention!
The following letter concerns the sheriff convention we are helping Sheriff Richard Mack organize in Las Vegas on January 30th. This event can and will change our country more than anything else going on in the country! I am not exaggerating, if you will take a few minutes to read the information and watch some of the videos www.countysheriffproject.org you will quickly realize the validity of what I am saying. This convention will allow us to reboot our government to be in tune with the original principles of our republic.It is now up to you to get your sheriff acquainted with this convention. If they are not in tune with what this convention is about and they don't want to come than you can immediately start working on finding a candidate to replace your existing sheriff. If they are in tune with the constitution than you need to get them to accept the invitation to come and we will pay for them to attend. Please read this letter below and act now today to make this convention a huge success.
Clyde Cleveland
clyde@commonsenserevisited.com
Everyone,We now have a list of every sheriff in the US and their contact information. Each one will have an invitation via email within a couple of days. We have placed the invitation on the web site, www.countysheriffproject.org, at the bottom of the page. You may print it off and hand it to your sheriff jus t to make sure he/she receives it. Encourage him/her to attend. Hand delivering this invitation with your request that he/she attend will add that personal touch. Please help us help you have a sheriff who will stand up with you and for you against tyranny.
Fortunately, there are many people who can see how important this project is. Unfortunately, there are not enough of you who understand just how important this project is. If we can get enough sheriffs onboard and in alignment with the Constitution and Bill of Rights, it could apply enough pressure around the country to all the others who are yet non-compliant and still status quo.
You may be surprised at how many sheriffs and even governors who are unaware that the State's power/authority supersedes that of the US government. Most sheriffs do not even understand their own authority as the only elected law enforcement officer. They have the ability to interpose on your behalf. At the conference, they will learn all of this and how to go about it. They will become part of a nationwide support system of other Constitutional sheriffs.
If you all understood how important this project is, we would not still be groveling for donations and working so hard to get exposure. There are a handful of us who have put a tremendous amount of time into this effort. It is an effort that will benefit EVERYONE of us. This is one of those things that in order for us t o fix it, we must fix it for everyone and not just ourselves.
Tom Woods, Joe Bannister, Stewart Rhodes, Michael Badnarik, and others are going to be part of the educational platform at the convention. All the sheriffs who have been standing up against the federal government are planning to attend and some of them will be speaking. I cannot stress enough the importance of this conference and getting your sheriff to it. Getting Constitutional sheriffs and getting them informed is critical to bringing our country back under control and in the hands of the People. This is a private conference by invitation only but on Tuesday, the day after the conference, there is a public meeting scheduled at the hotel to brief the public about the conference.
The federal and even state governments are trying to figure out ways to neuter our county sheriffs. In Connecticut, the state legislature voted to remove elected sheriff positions. So Connecticut doesn't even have sheriffs. Some governments are cutting their sheriff's salaries to poverty levels trying to force them out. I heard that some salaries have been cut to $23,000 annually for a sheriff!!!!!! How insulting is that??
This is sooooo important. The time available to get something done is collapsing quickly. Your support in this matter is absolutely crucial!!!! Please help get this information out and get your sheriff to this conference. Act quickly, time is of the essence!
Standing together for freedom!
Posted under: -
Dear Members of the Republic:
Submitted on August 26, 2011 at 02:47 pm by Ad MinDear Members of the Republic:
May 2011
The joint session call last Tuesday night raised critical issues regarding our strategy and method to create a true republic. I raised the point, as did several others, that this joint resolution suggested remedies that were needlessly oppressive. The rationalizations used as an excuse to bring in national to settle a dispute within a state were completely out of line with our founding principles. The idea that the clause in the constitution that guarantees a republican form of government could somehow give national the authority to intercede in an intrastate squabble is not credible. The idea that "national defense" could be used is even more out of line.
I know that those of you who created this resolution mean well and truly have the interests of our country and your families in your hearts, but this kind of proposed misuse of power is exactly what has led to the oppression we are trying to eliminate. My suggestion to you is to drop all the coercive enforcement provisions of your resolution and just let people know what you would like them to do. Let the states take care of their own problems and issues. Let the states decide what their priorities are.
It was pointed out by one of the national representatives that this was not a top down resolution because it did not come from national and that it had come from a "committee of the people." If that is the case national should have immediately let the committee know that they would have no part of what they were suggesting and that they had gone way too far in their desire to "force compliance." My concern, however, is not the source of this joint resolution, it is the results of what it will do to undermine state sovereignty and the supreme law of the land, which is the bill of rights.
Notice that I did not say the supreme law of the land is the constitution of 1791. I was not mistaken with my wording. That document is a flawed document and in every way the bill of rights is superior to it. This may be the major reason we are having trouble in this republic, people know there is something fundamentally wrong but they cannot put their finger on it. More on this later, please stick with me.
As I write in "Common Sense Revisited," it all comes down to the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. If there is ever a question about an issue, reading those first two paragraphs reminds us of the fundamental principle which is the foundation for all the other documents. Simply stated it says that each individual human being has indigenous power and the source of that power is our Creator. We are unique in that we have free will, the ability to manifest thoughts into reality, and unalienable rights. We as individuals are the only ones with that power and we never give it up, no matter what we have signed or done, indigenous power does not leave us. The surrogates we create to do things for us have no indigenous power, only surrogate power.
ALL surrogates, because they have people running them, have a tendency to usurp power they were not intended to have. This is just a manifestation of human nature. When a surrogate is out of control and begins to use coercion to maintain and increase their power, then we have the duty and the right to take back our indigenous power. We declare our indigenous power and then we take it back. And we ALWAYS have the right and duty to alter or abolish any surrogate at any time that infringes on our indigenous power.
This is essentially what is said in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration and this fundamental principle was well understood by the colonists before the revolutionary war. If you want to know how well it was understood and how well the colonists understood the principles of bottom up government you should read "American Insurgents, American Patriots" by Breen. This book provides us with a blueprint for re-establishing a republic and a clear understanding of why we need to build this republic back up again from the local level to the state level.
The role of national should be a clearing house of best practices. It should be an enabling organization and totally non-coercive. We will succeed if we do not divert our attention from building our jural assemblies, grand juries, local militias, etc.
We do, however, have a deeper problem with this particular movement to restore our republic. By adopting the constitution of 1791 we have adopted a flawed document. This constitution is not the people's document. It is instead the document of a cabal of lawyers, moneyed interests, and international bankers who wanted a powerful national government with a central bank that would be controlled by them. Hamilton was the main spokesman for this group.
The counter group to these nationalists/federalists was made up of people like Thomas Jefferson, George Mason, Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and Richard Henry Lee. In other words those who were the most in tune with indigenous power, they were the true federalists, as the word is defined, in that they believed in a very limited federal government. They ended up being called anti-federalists because the incredibly devious Hamilton labeled his group the federalists when in actuality they were nationalists and totally against supporting indigenous power.
George Mason was one of the most influential delegates at the convention, but when all was said and done he said he would "cut off his right hand" before he would sign the final document. Why were Mason and the most powerful and intelligent defenders of liberty in this country so dead set against this document?
First let's look at some of the things Mason said at the convention;
"Mr. Chairman, whether the Constitution be good or bad, the present clause clearly discovers that it is a national government, and no longer a Confederation. I mean that clause which gives the first hint of the general government laying direct taxes. The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes does, of itself, entirely change the confederation of the states into one consolidated government. This power, being at discretion, unconfined, and without any kind of control, must carry every thing before it. The very idea of converting what was formerly a confederation to a consolidated government, is totally subversive of every principle which has hitherto governed us. This power is calculated to annihilate totally the state governments. Will the people of this great community submit to be individually taxed by two different and distinct powers? Will they suffer themselves to be doubly harassed? These two concurrent powers cannot exist long together; the one will destroy the other: the general government being paramount to, and in every respect more powerful than the state governments, the latter must give way to the former. Is it to be supposed that one national government will suit so extensive a country, embracing so many climates, and containing inhabitants so very different in manners, habits, and customs? It is ascertained, by history, that there never was a government over a very extensive country without destroying the liberties of the people: history also, supported by the opinions of the best writers, shows us that monarchy may suit a large territory, and despotic governments ever so extensive a country, but that popular governments can only exist in small territories. Is there a single example, on the face of the earth, to support a contrary opinion? Where is there one exception to this general rule? Was there ever an instance of a general national government extending over so extensive a country, abounding in such a variety of climates, where the people retained their liberty?"
Mason and the other "anti-nationalists," the true patriots, knew that the government that would be created by this document would be used to create an illusion of freedom but that eventually it would grow to be as oppressive as any government in Europe. For the next several months the battle was joined. Only the support of Washington, who was primarily concerned about national defense issues, enabled the constitution to barely win acceptance, but only with a bill of rights. The bill of rights WAS CREATED at the insistence of the people and LEGALLY ADOPTED at the people's state ratifying conventions.
The constitution on the other hand was created by delegates who were sent to Philadelphia to amend the articles of confederation. They had no authority to do anything else. They could not amend the constitution because Rhode Island did not send delegates and the articles required 100% acceptance by all thirteen colonies for an amendment. These delegates had no authority to continue their meeting, they should have gone home. They did not go home. They decided among themselves, with no authority from their state legislatures, to lock the doors and begin a secret meeting to create a new government. This is when Patrick Henry, the great patriot and Christian pastor said, "I smell a rat."
The key point here is that the bill of rights was truly a manifestation of the people's will and indigenous power. The constitution was not legally created. The bill of rights contradicts the constitution in many key areas. The bill of rights is superior to the constitution, it is the supreme law of the land. It should be the first ten articles of the constitution and should be recognized as the supreme law of the land. Once the bill of rights was created they should have changed the supremacy clause in the constitution to "The bill of rights is the supreme law of the land." Since the bill of rights restricts the government and its powers under the constitution it also renders the "necessary and proper" clause of the constitution null and void.
Also the judiciary act of 1789 which created our entire federal court system should be null and void. There is no mention of an attorney general in the constitution. This was rammed through the congress by the nationalists/attorneys so they could set up and control the entire judicial system, and ultimately control all three branches. They have in fact accomplished this over the years due in large part to this unconstitutional act.
Recognizing the rightful place of the bill of rights as superior and preceding the rest of the constitution would allow us to replace the entire corrupt federal legal system and the corrupt supreme court with a supreme court derived from the jural assemblies and county grand juries. The people would have a direct influence on the judicial branch of the government and make it what it was intended to be, a true check on the misuse of power by the other two branches of government. This branch was also intended to be a protection of the people's rights and their property. This has all been perverted primarily by the attorneys. Self serving pitfalls have been built in by the lawyers for their control.
The welfare clause of the constitution has been misconstrued and needs to be clarified. An updated preamble would make clear the difference between "general" welfare and "special" welfare. Special welfare being theft and the basis of all forms of collectivism. The fifth "article" of the bill of rights states that we cannot be deprived of our property with out due process of law. The government cannot confiscate the property of one person and give that property to another person.
This right also prevents the government from taking action to devalue the currency as that deprives us of our property more effectively and comprehensively than any other kind of theft. Article five would therefore allow us to create a provision clearly stating that the national government can never pass a legal tender law restricting the right of a sovereign individual from choosing whatever currency he or she wanted to use in commerce. It would also restrict the government from disallowing competitive currencies from either state or local governments or from private sources. It would also allow us to state clearly that the congress can never again delegate its monetary authority to a private group of individual bankers.
The interstate commerce clause has been used to allow the government to interfere in virtually every aspect of our lives. In the 1780's there was a reasonable argument for the federal government to get involved in this arena, but 220 years of history has shown that this clause is one of the major sources of federal government encroachment on individual and state sovereignty. This clause should be eliminated on the basis that it has led to numerous violations of individual rights guaranteed to us by the bill of rights.
The oath of all military and police should be changed from agreeing to uphold the constitution to swearing to uphold the bill of rights. This would protect the people against the government using police and military to unfairly oppress individuals who did not agree with them or who opposed their corrupt behavior. It would also help us oppose the government from engaging in endless foreign wars.
The bottom line is that we have the opportunity at this point in time to create a future for our children that would be truly in tune with the founding principles. If we accept, with our signatures and delivered paperwork, the constitution of 1791 with all its current flaws we will be doing ourselves and every person in the world a huge disservice. Right now, as it is, no living individual, has signed a contract and delivered that signed contract accepting the constitution as having any authority over them at all. It is not a valid contract for those living today in this country. Read this amazing article by Lysander Spooner from 1870 on the constitution. It is called "NO TREASON The Constitution of No Authority" http://jim.com/treason.htm
We must support the right founding documents, and we must not support a flawed constitution that would continue to enslave us all. What I have outlined here in these last few paragraphs is explained in a book that you must read. It is called "The Constitution that Never Was" by Ralph Boryszewski. This author spent 27 years as a police officer fighting corrupt judges, district attorneys and police officers. He has done extensive research on the constitution, its history and the law. He has given us a legal blue print for fixing the flawed constitution that has given the lawyers, politicians, powerful special interests, and especially the international bankers control over our lives and those of our children.
The plan, which his research supports, would allow us to eliminate the corrupt federal judiciary and replace it with a bottom up judicial system based on natural law. It would allow us to eliminate the most damaging clauses in the constitution; the supremacy clause, the necessary and proper clause, and the interstate commerce clause. We could also eliminate, under the fifth amendment, the clause allowing the federal government to levy the enumerated direct tax, legal tender laws, completive currency restrictions, etc.
The original 13th amendment will disallow attorneys from holding office in any branch of the federal government. Hopefully every state and county will have a similar provision in their constitutions. In Florida we have placed an extensive bill of rights at the beginning of our constitution. I hope all states will be doing the same. Many consider the Virginia Declaration of Rights, which is the preface do the Virginia constitution, to be one of the original founding documents. It was written by George Mason, here are the first three articles:
SECTION I. That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.
SEC. 2. That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people; that magistrates are their trustees and servants and at all times amenable to them.
SEC. 3. That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and that, when any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.
These principles are totally in tune with the Declaration of Independence and the basic principle which clearly delineates the relationship of authority, the individual is the master, the government, or any other surrogate, is the servant. So what do we really need our federal government to do for us? At this time we really only need the federal government to provide for the common defense, that is all. The articles of confederation would be just fine for us at this time. We have been operating as a union for over 200 years and virtually every problem we have is a result of the outrageous growth of government, especially since it became a corporate structure in 1871. The state or local governments, or private organizations or companies could do everything that the federal government does for us now and do it much more effectively.
The resolution recommended on Tuesday night mentioned the ineffectiveness of the Articles of Confederation. People have to remember that we have been subjected to 200 years of propaganda that our constitution has given us our freedom and that the articles were totally ineffective. Remember that under the Articles of Confederation the colonists defeated the greatest military force the world had ever known. George Mason and the other individuals who wanted to retain the Articles and not drastically change the basic structure of governance under the Articles were arguably the heart and soul of this country.
The "Give me Liberty or Give me death" speech of Patrick Henry galvanized the nation. Samuel Adams was responsible for the Boston Tea Party and the Committees of Correspondence. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration, along with John Adams, and was the galvanizing force for the opposition to the Hamiltonians and the central bankers. Richard Henry Lee was one of the most brilliant spokespersons for freedom in the country and was a President of the united states under the Articles of Confederation.
Would you rather be a Hamiltonian or a Jeffersonian? Is it top down or bottom up? Frankly I don't think we could get back to the Articles of Confederation. I would prefer it, but I think it may be too much of a paradigm shift for most people in this country. However, I do think we could get people to accept the plan proposed above which is based on the writings of Boryszewski and Spooner. We simply place the bill of rights where it should be by law as superior to the rest of the constitution and make the changes suggested above. People are familiar with the bill of rights and this is a plan that will gain wide acceptance.
Please keep in mind though, that the Articles were never shut off. It is a perpetual union and the government under the articles just ceased to be inhabited. It could be re-inhabited and then the three or four key problems with the articles that were addressed at the constitutional convention could be added as amendments. It would be easier to do that than to accept a flawed constitution and then have to go back and eliminate the problems.
So we really have three choices: 1. Accept the flawed constitution of 1791 2. Follow the plan described above inspired by Boryszewski and Spooner and make the bill of rights the supreme law of the land, or 3. re-inhabit the government under the Articles of Confederation.
I don't see how anyone who is serious about restoring our fundamental principles could accept number 1. above. I know I can't continue to bring people into this republic if we are asking them to accept and ratify such a flawed document.
I hope you will all read the books by Breen and especially by Boryszewski, and the incredible article by Spooner. I also just ordered "Hamilton's Curse" by De Lorenzo, the same author who wrote the expose on Abraham Lincoln. This book outlines the history of the battle between Jefferson and Hamilton. I think if we all read these books it will give us the knowledge to make the right choice going forward. We cannot afford to accept the constitution that the Hamiltonians created. We must get this right.
By the way I have read responses to Tuesday nights call that criticize those who are not totally supportive of the coercive tactics proposed under the joint resolution. The major theme of those critics is that we are under this enormous pressure from the evil forces in this world and we must rush out and get all these positions filled and documents signed so we can enlist the support of other nations, funding sources, and the military.
I do not underestimate the evil of the ruling elite. I know they are capable of creating great destruction and upheaval. However we will not get support from divine providence if our underlying principles are off base. We will not get support from divine providence if we don't build from the bottom up. We will not get support from divine providence if we forget that we are all about non-coercion and actually start using coercion to try to force compliance with what our particular view of the action steps happen to be.
In my view the steps outlined above in either alternative 2 or 3, would elicit the support of divine providence to a much greater degree than our current direction. I ask those who consider yourself to be Christians, would Yehowshua want you to support a flawed constitution which has enslaved us to a ruling elite consisting of lawyers, international bankers and professional politicians who are devoted to a one world government?
Let's focus on the essence of what we are doing here and get right with God's law. Then let's build our state republics up from the county level one person at a time. We will find that to be a much easier and faster process than we ever imagined possible when we get this right.
If you would like a copy of "The Constitution that Never was" you can order it from Amazon for $51.95 plus shipping, OR, if you would like, you can email heidi@commonsenserevisited.com and send her a check for $20 which includes shipping. I really want you to read this book! In fact if you buy this book I will throw in a free copy of Common Sense Revisited.
From force and fear to freedom and Love,
Clyde Cleveland
Common Sense Revisited
813-944-8900clyde@commonsenserevisited.com
www.commonsenserevisited.com“The principles on which we engaged, of which the charter of our independence is the record, were sanctioned by the laws of our being, and we but obeyed them in pursuing undeviatingly the course they called for.”
Thomas Jefferson, to Georgetown Republicans in 1809More quotes from George Mason from the constitutional convention
"popular governments can only exist in small territories"
"To a government which, in the nature of things, cannot but be defective, no powers ought to be given but such as are absolutely necessary"
"Gentlemen may talk of public virtue and confidence; we shall be told that the House of Representatives will consist of the most virtuous men on the continent, and that in their hands we may trust our dearest rights. This, like all other assemblies, will be composed of some bad and some good men; and, considering the natural lust of power so inherent in man, I fear the thirst of power will prevail to oppress the people."
Posted under: -
Clyde's Recommended Reading List
Submitted on June 25, 2011 at 05:04 pm by Ad MinAmerican Insurgents, American Patriots by Breen. This book provides a blueprint for re-establishing a Republic and a clear understanding of why we need to build this Republic back up again from the local level to the state level. This is available at Amazon or at any bookstore.
If you would like a copy of The Constitution that Never Was by Boryszewski, you may order it from Amazon for $51.95 plus shipping, OR, if you prefer, you may email heidi@commonsenserevisited.com and send her a check for $20 which includes shipping. I really hope that you will read this book! In fact, if you buy this book I will throw in a free copy of Common Sense Revisited.
Hamilton's Curse by De Lorenzo, the same author who wrote the expose on Abraham Lincoln. This book outlines the history of the battle between Jefferson and Hamilton.
What Ever Happened to Justice, and What Ever Happened to Penny Candy by Richard Maybury, available at www.bluestockingpress.com. These are on the absolute must read list!
The Creature from Jekyll Island, by G. Edward Griffin. This is a comprehensive history of the Federal Reserve and its impact on society.
"It's Good to be King", by Michael Badnarik. This is excellent analysis of the constitution and bill of rights from the perspective of the 2004 Libertarian Presidential candidate. http://www.constitutionpreservation.org/constitution-preservation/good-to-be-king
The 5,000 Year Leap, by W. Cleon Skousen. This classic explains all of the fundamental principles of nature, which guided the Founders.
The Majesty of God’s Law, by Cleon Skousen. Another classic, which provides an in-depth examination of the historical and philosophical sources of knowledge which most influenced the Founders.
Economics in One Lesson, by Henry Hazlitt. Hazlett’s book is the basis for understanding freedom-based economics.
The Revolution: A Manifesto, by Ron Paul. This addresses how to achieve economic freedom, civil liberties, and personal responsibility, and the role the government is supposed to play.
A Foreign Policy of Freedom: Peace, Commerce and Honest Friendship, by Ron Paul. Paul makes the case for a foreign policy of non-intervention, based on Paul’s 20-year career in Congress.
Healing our World, by Mary Ruwart. This book clearly explains why government programs do not work and how freedom does work.
Restoring the Heart of America, by Clyde Cleveland and Ed Noyes. Cleveland and Noyes provide clear examples of how people can better solve their problems with freedom-based, non-coercive, bottom-up solutions.
Renewing American Compassion, by Marvin Olasky. The author provides an historical perspective on excellent community-based systems for helping the needy.
ON-LINE READING LIST
“Sockdolager! A Tale Of Davy Crockett meeting up with the Constitution.” http://www.nccs.net/newsletter/oct96nl.html
"NO TREASON: The Constitution of No Authority" http://jim.com/treason.htm. This is an amazing article by Lysander Spooner from 1870 on the Constitution.
“The Law,” by Bastiat http://bastiat.org. This is an incredibly powerful essay on the nature of the relationship between government and the individual; a classic. 15 pages.
“The Nature of Man and His Government,” by Robert LeFevre
http://mises.org/books/mangovernment.pdf This is a brilliant analysis of what government really is and a call for non-coercive alternatives. 25 pages.“Common Sense Revisited” at www.commonsenserevisited.com. Download the PDF for free. This explains indigenous/surrogate power and bottom up government. 35 pages.
The following two articles by Dee Hock:
The Art of Chaordic leadership http://www.leadertoleader.org/knowledgecenter/journal.aspx?ArticleID=62
Transformation by Design http://www.enlightennext.org/magazine/j22/hock.asp
The last three items listed below were some of the most influential reading materials in the colonies from 1750 to 1776.
“Common Sense” by Tom Paine, the classic which changed the world. 48 pages.
http://www.mondopolitico.com/library/commonsense/subject1.htm“The Second Treatise of Civil Government,” by John Locke
http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtreat.htm. Along with Common Sense, this was the most influential educational material for the colonists pre-revolution.“Jonathon Mayhew's Sermon” John Adams said this sermon marked the beginning of the Revolution
Posted under:
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/etas/44/. The full text can be downloaded. 55 pages.- Clyde Cleveland
- Reading List
-
Radio Interview from C4L Regional Conference
Submitted on May 20, 2010 at 04:00 pm by Eliyah FinkelsteinThe C4L event was a big success. We distributed hundreds of copies of Common Sense Revisited and spoke to many like-minded liberty organizations. Todd McGreevy and Clyde Cleveland (author of CS;R) hosted a 1-hour radio show live from the event. They interviewed many congressional candidates as well as Tom Woods and Michael Badnarik.
Posted under:
You can listen to the 1-hour radio show for free here.- Campaign for liberty
- radio show
- candidates
-
Campaign for Liberty Conference in Des Moines
Submitted on May 12, 2010 at 11:40 pm by Eliyah FinkelsteinThe author of Common Sense Revisited will be attending the Campaign for Liberty Conference in Des Moines this weekend May 14th-16th. Information about the event can be found here. We will have a booth and will be distributing copies of Common Sense Revisited (2nd edition) for a $1 suggested donation. If you find yourself inspired to buy bulk copies at the event - don't worry! - we can ship copies directly to your door. The author will be at our booth signing copies periodically throughout the event. Don't miss this chance to get your copy signed by the originally anonymous author!
See you there!
Posted under:- Campaign for liberty
- conference
- event
-
The Bottom-Up Health Care Solution
Submitted on February 02, 2010 at 09:57 pm by Eliyah FinkelsteinYou may have noticed that we recently launched a campaign to educate as many people as we can about the philosophy of bottom-up health care. The material of this campaign is a 9-minute audio lecture. This download is free to anyone, so please share it with your family and friends. To download the lecture, go to this page and put in your name and e-mail address. You will be automatically directed to a downloads page after that.
Posted under:
- health care
- education
-
-
Life Liberty and Proper Tea
September 15, 2009 at 06:27 pm by Bernie LeeOrganization under:I am an Englishman who lives in England, which is a distinct country being eroded by the UK and the EU. There is a growing freedom movement here that I wish to encourage, inspire and work with.
My blog offers links to the best educational material I can find on economics, history, politics and the freedom movement. It should become more biased to my part of the world but currently features mostly American sourced material.
I want to join up with like minded people and especially creative types to create multimedia materials to get the word out.
Drop by for a smoke and a cup of tea.
-
Alex Jones
September 15, 2009 at 05:29 pm by Gary BinkleyOrganization under:Alex Jones movies are world renowned for factual content on such subjects as 9/11, swine flue, the corporate take over of the economy, the FED and the New World Order. This site is a must for those who need good documented resources for the peaceful battle to take our Republic back.
-
